| Pages: [1] |
1. dev response needed: what is actually being done to lower plex price - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Matthias Ancaladron wrote: well? looking at 3.5m thats a 700m increase in a few months. in 2009 it cost 300m, i came back november it was only 900m. how does plex go up 800m in a few months and to a larger degree that it did in nearly 10 year...
- by Lura Zara - at 2017.07.25 18:36:47
|
2. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Heres a grand Idea, Nerf incursions. The amount of ISK made through that alone is ridiculously farmed. However now your talking about nerfing capital ships again. Which I hardly see as a good thing when a capital is far more likely to die in actua...
- by Lura Zara - at 2017.06.09 10:34:51
|
3. [WTB] 2x Enforcer - in Want Ads & Trades [original thread]
Still looking for 2x enforcers and 1x pacifier now.
- by Lura Zara - at 2017.05.16 06:15:15
|
4. [WTB] 2x Enforcer - in Want Ads & Trades [original thread]
Still looking for 2X enforcers
- by Lura Zara - at 2017.05.12 15:16:47
|
5. [WTB] 2x Enforcer - in Want Ads & Trades [original thread]
rrtyui wrote: Mail sent from a different char. Scammed for 1 isk, tststs Responded, Will be at work unable to respond again till later tonight!
- by Lura Zara - at 2017.05.09 17:04:06
|
6. [WTB] 2x Enforcer - in Want Ads & Trades [original thread]
If anyone has or will be getting one when CCP releases them I would like to purchase a total of two enforcers. Willing to negotiate price. Please post below if you have sent me an ingame mail.
- by Lura Zara - at 2017.05.09 16:29:22
|
7. Sticky:[May] CONCORD Aerospace Promotional Ships - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I'm sorry CCP, But making these ships as "Offer exclusives" Only... makes zero sense at all. We dont need rare ships. We need interesting ships that are balanced and replaceable. If you put them as Concord LP obtainable for high prices after the ...
- by Lura Zara - at 2017.04.02 04:46:57
|
8. Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Saerin Korvalu wrote: Lura Zara wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Yeah the 50 per level bonus is intentionally one of the weaker ship bonuses, to keep the rest of the package balanced. I am open to considering other bonuses like the ECCM one, and ...
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.18 21:00:14
|
9. Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: Yeah the 50 per level bonus is intentionally one of the weaker ship bonuses, to keep the rest of the package balanced. I am open to considering other bonuses like the ECCM one, and I'm interested in other ideas you folks have ...
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.18 20:46:38
|
10. Singularity: Rule violation reporting - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
A player by the name of LastGunslinger Tull was being disruptive and harassing other players in Thera. EVE System > Subspace communication beacon unreachable. Channel list unavailable. bioreactor kendons > yolo Kevin Reboolf > BOOGIE MO...
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.16 22:27:54
|
11. One account per IP address - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Personally I dislike alts and multiboxing. For the past 10 [ish] years I have only run one account. Probably because I'm simply attached to my character. Yeah getting rid of alts would make alot of people pissy, But honestly, I would rather it be...
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.14 10:10:47
|
12. Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Pestilen Ratte wrote: *Snip out the salty* Frankly this post was so long and drawn out and full of salt I forgot what your point was... But I fully agree about the mordu ships. So far Checks out good for PVE As far as PVP goes, It look...
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.13 06:03:33
|
13. [Carnyx] The Jackdaw (Caldari Tactical Destroyer) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm not gana lie, Is there anyway we could appeal to the art department to simply remove the front antennas? They are so out of place. The backones are awesome and perfect but the front ones just throw off the entire flow of the ship.
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.12 23:21:03
|
14. Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Ima gonna rat with it. I actually was going to do the same, Its a gorgeous looking PVE ship, Despite everything in this thread being about PVP so far. I'm betting i could make mine as is run a Haven/Sanctum. Maybe not the ...
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.11 16:01:14
|
15. intermediate class of capital ships (for wormholes) please. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sorry but restricting a ship to just wormholes make no since at all either through lore or any other medium. All or nothing dear. Not just for those special snowflakes in WH's. PS: wormholes are supposed to be difficult to occupy without huge log...
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.11 05:17:30
|
16. Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
FT Diomedes wrote: Are people really complaining that you have a hard time fitting a Large Shield Extender on a destroyer hull? Yes, yes they are. They also complain about not fitting a 10mn AB to a dessy.
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.11 04:07:49
|
17. Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
TrouserDeagle wrote: Stitch Kaneland wrote: Guys.. its a missile a boat. It doesn't need to be as fast as a svipul or confessor. Have we not learned what fast ships and missiles do? Look at the garmur/orthrus, those 2 ships have been a cance...
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.10 23:10:18
|
18. Sticky:[Carnyx] The Jackdaw - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
How are people getting these dps/fitting ideas? I cant find anything for EFT on it.
- by Lura Zara - at 2015.05.10 15:23:16
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |